Announcement PDF Quarterly Activities Report Quarterly Activities Report For the period ended 30 June 2025 Highlights  Group copper equivalent production of 10.9kt1 for the quarter at improved AISC of A$4.50/lb Cu eq  Cash and receivables at end of quarter increased to $49.5M  Refinancing of corporate guarantee facilities successfully completed  Higher Tritton production of 6.2kt Cu at lower AISC of A$4.22/lb  Tritton processing plant operating above nameplate capacity with the availability of additional ore from the Murrawombie Pit  Strong Cracow gold production of 11.0koz and AISC of A$3,075/oz  Good cost control across operations for the year  North Queensland assets on care and maintenance – pursuing options for divestment Safety – LTIFR Copper produced Unit Sep 24 Qtr Dec 24 Qtr Mar 25 Qtr Jun 25 Qtr /mmhrs 1.4 1.6 1.9 1.3 - - kt 6.0 5.8 7.0 6.2 24.9 27 – 32 YTD FY25 Guidance Gold produced koz 15.2 15.1 11.9 13.1 55.2 50 – 62 Silver produced koz 43.9 35.2 45.2 60.8 185.2 200 – 240 Cu eq production1 kt 10.2 10.2 10.7 10.9 42.1 40 – 48 A$M 49.1 45.0 44.5 58.2 196.7 172 – 210 Processing A$M 21.5 19.2 21.1 14.9 76.7 69 – 85 Site & G&A A$M 9.3 10.8 9.6 8.9 38.6 35 – 42 TC/RCs A$M 4.9 4.8 1.3 1.9 12.9 17 – 21 Operating Costs Mining Product handling A$M 4.5 4.8 5.5 5.3 20.0 19 – 23 Care & maintenance A$M 2.3 2.4 2.9 3.1 10.8 3–5 Sustaining A$M 15.1 19.5 17.6 17.3 69.4 64 – 79 Growth A$M 3.0 4.1 13.0 13.2 33.4 38 – 49 Exploration A$M 3.0 1.7 2.2 2.9 9.8 5–8 Projects A$M 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.3 1.7 1–2 A$M A$/lb Cu eq 119.7 113.8 116.2 108.6 458.0 - 5.32 5.04 4.91 4.50 4.93 - Capital Costs AISC AISC 1 Formula for Copper Equivalent (Cu eq) = ((Cu Produced x Cu $/t) + (Au Produced x Au $/oz) + (Ag Produced x Ag $/oz)) / (Cu $/t). Produced quantities are after recovery. Commodity prices – Sep quarter: US$9,210/t Cu, US$2,474/oz Au and US$29/oz Ag, Dec quarter: US$9,193/t Cu, US$2,663/oz Au and US$31/oz Ag, Mar quarter: US$9,345/t Cu, US$2,861/oz Au and US$32/oz Ag, Jun quarter: US$9,524/t Cu, US$3,281/oz Au and US$34/oz Ag Aeris Resources Limited 1 Group Safety, Environment and Community Pleasingly, Aeris recorded no lost time injuries for the quarter with Group LTIFR reducing to 1.3 for the quarter. There were no reportable environmental incidents during the quarter. Figure 1: Group LTIFR 3 No of LTI LTIFR 2 1 - 2 Tritton Operations (NSW) Key points for quarter:  Production of 6.2kt Cu (up 44%) at AISC of A$4.22/lb (down 31%)  Processing plant operating above nameplate capacity (>2Mtpa) towards the end of the quarter  Stockpiles of 77kt mined ore available for processing in FY26  Capital costs lower than planned due to Stage 2 waste stripping in the pit being pushed into FY26 Production Summary Unit Sep 24 Qtr Dec 24 Qtr Mar 25 Qtr Jun 25 Qtr YTD FY25 Guidance Ore Mined Kt 269.1 243.6 218.6 455.8 1,187.0 Mined Grade % Cu 1.87 1.78 2.03 1.49 1.74 Ore Milled Kt 273.9 239.3 238.7 382.1 1,134.0 Milled Grade % Cu 1.90 1.69 1.90 1.70 1.79 Recovery Cu 95.9% 95.4% 95.7% 95.6% 95.7% Copper Produced Kt 5.0 3.9 4.3 6.2 19.4 21 – 25 Gold Produced Koz 1.5 1.1 1.4 2.0 6.1 7–9 Silver Produced Koz 43.9 35.2 45.2 60.8 185.2 200 – 240 Mining A$M 27.4 24.9 28.1 41.8 122.2 105 – 128 Processing A$M 7.4 7.8 7.5 7.7 30.4 29 – 36 Site G&A A$M 5.2 6.5 6.4 5.7 23.8 21 – 25 TC/RCs A$M 4.2 3.4 0.8 1.9 10.3 13 – 16 Product Handling A$M 3.7 3.2 3.4 5.3 15.5 14 – 17 By-Product Credit A$M (7.1) (6.3) (9.1) (12.9) (35.4) Royalties A$M 2.0 1.8 2.7 3.1 9.6 Corporate G&A A$M 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.2 Inventory Movements A$M 0.8 0.6 5.0 (7.6) (1.2) Sustaining Capital1 A$M 11.5 14.8 13.8 12.4 52.5 A$M 55.6 57.3 59.0 57.9 229.7 A$/lb 5.06 6.75 6.16 4.22 5.37 Growth Capital A$M 2.7 4.0 12.2 13.1 32 37 – 45 Exploration A$M 0.5 0.2 0.9 1.3 2.9 1–2 A$M 58.7 61.5 72.2 72.3 264.7 A$/lb 5.35 7.24 7.53 5.27 6.19 Cost Summary All-In Sustaining Costs2 All-In Costs 1. Includes sustaining capital, capitalised mine development, rehabilitation and financing payments (principal and interest) on leased assets 2. All-In Sustaining and All-In Costs are based on copper produced. The March quarter has been amended for a for a calculation error. 51 – 63 3 Operations Tritton achieved production of 6.2kt Cu in the June quarter, a 44% increase on the previous quarter. Underground production was higher quarter on quarter with additional stoping areas online. The mining improvement program continued to demonstrate better performance in key activities from that achieved in in the first half of the year:    diamond drilling metres up 76%; development metres up 28%; backfill placement up 114%. Total ore mined was boosted with the introduction of Stage 1 ore from the Murrawombie open pit, although the production ramp up was slower than expected. Since quarter end, Stage 1 mining completed, with the Stage 2 cut back progressing to plan. At the end of the quarter, 77kt of mined ore was stockpiled, available for processing in FY26. The processing plant performed well for the quarter, achieving new daily and weekly milling records towards the end of June when ore was available from the open pit. An annualised rate >2Mtpa was achieved in the final weeks of June, significantly above nameplate capacity of 1.8Mtpa. Metallurgical recoveries continued to be higher than plan 4 Figure 2: Stage 1 mining at Murrawombie Pit At the Constellation project, mine planning work commenced on the updated Mineral Resource model to optimise open pit staging options, underground designs and production schedules. Technical work progressed on metallurgical test work, site layout and mine integration design. Aeris continues to work with the NSW DPHI Planning Authority, Mining Concierge, EPA, Resources Regulator, Heritage NSW and the Bogan Shire Council focussing on all aspects of the State Significant Development Consent (EIS). Costs Gross mining costs increased significantly with the ramp up in activities at Murrawombie Pit. All in sustaining costs however were lower on a unit basis due to higher copper tonnes produced. Operating and sustaining capital costs for the year were within guidance. Growth capital for the quarter was lower than guidance due to capitalised stripping for Phase 2 of the pit being pushed into FY26. 5 Exploration During the quarter, work progressed on refining the greenfield exploration strategy at Tritton. Regional geological interpretation continued, focused on understanding the key geological controls influencing mineral system formation — from the broader basin scale down to specific prospect areas. This work is expected to continue through the first half of FY26, with early-stage, on-ground exploration to follow, targeting the most prospective corridors identified through the review. Underground resource definition drilling at the Avoca Tank deposit commenced during the quarter. The resource definition drill program is targeting mineralisation down plunge below the base of the current Mineral Resource. Figure 3: Long section looking north east at the Avoca Tank deposit. Resource definition drilling is targeting extensions to mineralisation down-plunge from the known Mineral Resource (green and blue wireframes) 6 Cracow Operations (QLD) Key points for quarter:  Gold production 11.0koz (up 22%) at AISC of A$3,075/oz (down 12%)  The secondary cyclone was commissioned in the quarter, with the processing plant demonstrating sustained improvement in recoveries from regrind mill debottlenecking  TSF lift approved and contractor mobilised to construct in Q1 FY26 Production Summary Unit Sep 24 Qtr Dec 24 Qtr Mar 25 Qtr Jun 25 Qtr YTD FY25 Guidance Ore Mined Kt 126.8 130.4 115.6 133.8 506.6 Mined Grade g/t 3.30 3.08 2.47 2.68 2.89 Ore Milled Kt 157.6 156.8 143.5 159.6 617.6 Milled Grade g/t 2.80 2.68 2.19 2.36 2.51 Recovery Au 91.1% 90.4% 88.9% 91.1% 90.5% Gold Produced Koz 12.9 12.2 9.0 11.0 45.1 Gold Sold Koz 12.6 12.4 9.4 10.8 45.3 A$M 14.0 14.5 16.4 16.3 61.2 57 – 70 Processing A$M 6.5 6.6 6.8 7.2 27.1 24 – 30 Site G&A A$M 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.9 11.0 11 – 13 By-Product Credit A$M (0.2) (0.3) (0.3) (0.5) (1.4) Royalties A$M 2.6 2.7 2.4 3.0 10.7 40 – 49 Cost Summary Mining Corporate G&A A$M 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.7 Inventory Movements A$M 0.2 (0.4) 0.7 (1.0) (0.5) Sustaining Capital1 A$M 3.6 4.6 3.5 4.9 16.7 A$M 29.7 30.9 32.7 33.3 126.5 A$/oz 2,352 2,488 3,473 3,075 2,795 Growth Capital A$M - - - - - 0–1 Exploration A$M 2.0 1.2 0.9 1.2 5.3 3–4 A$M 31.7 32.1 33.5 34.5 131.8 A$/oz 2,509 2,587 3,567 3,187 2,912 All-In Sustaining Costs2 All-In Costs2 1. 2. 13 – 16 Includes sustaining capital, capitalised mine development, rehabilitation and financing payments (principal and interest) on leased assets All-In Sustaining and All-In Costs are based on gold sold Operations Cracow performed well in the June quarter with gold production of 11.0koz, 22% higher quarter on quarter due to improved mining rates and recoveries. Higher underground production offset lower grade stockpile material in the mill feed. The newly installed secondary cyclone circuit at the plant is performing well enabling 100% of leach feed to now pass through the regrind mill. A sustained 1-2% improvement in metallurgical recovery has been achieved by debottlenecking the regrind mill. 7 The next lift on the tailings dam was approved by the regulator and the construction contractor has mobilised to site to commence construction in Q1 FY26. Costs AISC costs was well managed in the quarter, achieving a lower AISC/oz of A$3,075, driven by higher gold production. Costs for the year were well controlled with capital and operating costs broadly within guidance ranges. Exploration A review is underway to assess the remaining gold prospectivity within the Golden Plateau mine footprint. Previous drill programs completed by Aeris at Golden Plateau focused on targeting structures south of the historical workings (Chas, King and Harry's lode) and a shallow lode on the western margin of the deposit (Western lode). The primary focus of the drill programs was to delineate discrete high-grade structures for extraction via underground mining methods. The current review focuses on understanding the potential for a broader, low-grade gold system that could support a larger-scale open-pit mining operation. The Golden Plateau deposit is the most significant contributor to the known Cracow goldfield in terms of ounces, with approximately 850koz produced to date. Mining (underground) began in the early 1930s and continued until 1976. Production over this period totalled approximately 1.55Mt at 11.9g/t1 Au for 596koz Au, over eight levels to a maximum depth of 260m below surface. Following a short hiatus, open pit mining commenced in 1987 and continued through to 19901, targeting lower-grade mineralisation surrounding the previously mined highgrade shoots. The pit advanced to approximately 120m below surface and mined through the upper three underground levels, producing 2.2Mt at 2.7g/t Au for 190koz Au1. Toward the end of the open pit operation, a brief phase of underground mining occurred along the NS12 structure located on the northeast portion of the deposit. Reported production was 46kt at 9.4g/t Au for 14koz Au. While the review is in its early stages, initial assessment of in-pit grade control data has identified extensive low-grade (+1g/t Au) mineralisation that was left behind by underground mining. This low-grade mineralised halo appears continuous in places and is supported by historical drilling below the pit, which intersected similar low-grade gold zones. Mining records also show that underground stoping continued below the current pit floor, further highlighting the potential for continuity of mineralisation at depth. 1 Vigar, A.J, 1994 “Grade Modelling Reconciled to Open Pit Mining at the Golden Plateau Mine, Cracow, Queensland” 1994 AuslMM Student Conference April 1994, pg 49-54 8 Figure 4: A) Long section looking north and (B) level slice (+/-10m) at the 385mRL at the Golden Plateau deposit showing underground stopes (grey wireframe) and open pit surface (transparent brown). Drill hole and underground face sample data are shown displaying Au grades. 9 North Queensland Operations (QLD) Key points for quarter:  Operations on care and maintenance  Options for divestment of North Queensland assets are being pursued Production Summary Unit Sep 24 Qtr Dec 24 Qtr Mar 25 Qtr Jun 25 Qtr YTD Ore Mined kt 106.4 70.6 - - 176.9 Mined Grade FY25 Guidance % Cu 2.51 2.28 - - 2.42 Ore Milled kt 101.8 106.6 154.1 - 362.5 Milled Grade % Cu 1.57 2.11 2.06 - 1.94 Recovery Cu 62.3% 85.1% 82.0% - 78.5% Copper Produced kt 1.0 1.9 2.6 - 5.5 6–7 Gold Produced koz 0.8 1.8 1.5 - 4.0 3–4 A$M 7.7 5.5 - 0.1 13.3 10 – 12 Processing A$M 7.6 4.8 6.9 - 19.3 16 – 19 Site G&A A$M 1.3 1.6 0.5 0.3 3.7 3–4 TC/RCs A$M 0.7 1.3 0.6 - 2.6 4–5 5–6 Cost Summary Mining Product Handling A$M 0.8 1.6 2.1 - 4.5 By-Product Credit A$M (5.4) (4.4) (2.7) (0.2) (12.6) Royalties A$M 1.6 0.3 1.5 0.3 3.8 Corporate G&A A$M 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.3 Inventory Movements A$M 4.6 0.9 - - 5.5 Sustaining Capital1 A$M - - 0.3 - 0.1 A$M 19.4 12.0 9.4 0.8 41.4 A$/lb 8.81 2.84 1.64 n/a 3.40 Growth A$M 0.2 0.2 - - 0.4 1–3 Exploration A$M 0.1 - - 0.2 0.3 0–1 A$M 19.6 12.2 9.5 1.0 42.1 A$/lb 8.94 2.89 1.65 n/a 3.46 All-In Sustaining Costs2 All-In Costs2 1. Includes sustaining capital, capitalised mine development, rehabilitation a nd financing payments 2. (principal and interest) on leased assets All-In Sustaining and All-In Costs are based on copper produced Operations The North Queensland operations remain on care and maintenance. No material work was undertaken on the site this quarter. The company continues to investigate options for a divestment of the assets. 10 Jaguar Operations (WA) Key points for quarter:  Operation in care and maintenance, incurring costs of $3.0 million  Advanced the feasibility study, with particular focus on mine development and production schedules to optimise project value  Renewed focus on greenfield exploration Exploration During the quarter exploration focussed on drilling at the Holey Moley gold prospect (E37/981) with base metal exploration continuing to advance drill targets along the known prospective 10km volcanic-hosted massive sulphide (VHMS) corridor. Drilling at the Holey Moley gold prospect included a three-hole RC drilling program. The prospect is located along a WNW trending structure interpreted to merge into the more regionally significant NNW trending Heather Bore shear, which hosts a welldefined 2km shallow gold anomaly1. Additional pathfinder anomalism, including bismuth and tellurium, are coincident with this gold zone. The WNW structure targeted in this round of drilling lies within a broader series of parallel features interpreted from geophysical datasets, which appear to intersect the Great Western and Celtic deposits outside Aeris tenements to the west. The current working assumption is that these structures form high-angle features to the Heather Bore shear, which may transmit and focus gold mineralisation. Due to operational constraints, the drill holes were terminated before reaching their planned hole depths and may not have fully tested the target structure. However, assay results from the program confirmed low-grade, discontinuous gold mineralisation, with best results including 1m @ 1.48 g/t Au in hole 25HMRC002A (refer to Figure 5 and Figure 6). These drill intercepts occur at similar relative elevations to nearby historical intersections and appear consistent with a supergene or transitionzone style of mineralisation. While results were sub-economic, the program has refined the geological model and confirmed mineralisation continuity across a key structural trend. Follow-up drilling is warranted to further assess the potential for primary gold mineralisation along the WNW trending structure. 1 Refer to ASX announcement “Exploration and resource drilling update” dated 17 June 2024 11 Figure 5: Heather Bore and Holey Moley gold prospects within the northern margin of the Jaguar Project tenement. Regional geology is shown with maximum down-hole gold grades displayed across historical1 (aircore/RC) and more recent Aeris drill programs 2 12 Figure 6: Cross section view looking north-west at the Holey Moley gold prospect showing downhole gold assays from the 2025 drill program and historical programs completed by previous explorers1 The base metal exploration drill target review defined eight high-priority drill-ready targets (refer to Figure 7). A first pass drill program is planned to test each target in FY26. 1 Refer to ASX announcement “Exploration and resource drilling update” dated 17 th June 2024 2 Refer to ASX announcement “Quarterly Activities Report – Sept 2024” dated 30th October 2024 1 Refer to ASX announcement “Exploration and resource drilling update” dated 17 June 2024 13 Figure 7: Regional geology across the known VHMS corridor showing the location of the four known VMS deposits (Triumph, Teutonic Bore, Jaguar and Bentley) and the eight priority drill targets that will be tested in FY26 14 Target generation was informed by a regional mapping campaign that reclassified stratigraphy immediately east of the known prospective VHMS corridor. An extensive sericite-altered untested rhyolitic volcaniclastic sequence, up to 1km thick, had previously been misinterpreted as massive rhyolite and largely overlooked by earlier explorers. While the presence of this unit alone does not confirm prospectivity, it becomes of greater interest when considered in conjunction with other datasets. Discrete gravity anomalies identified in Aeris’ 2022 infill gravity survey, low-level pathfinder anomalism returned from ongoing rock chip sampling, and the presence of pervasive sericite alteration collectively support a compelling case for VHMS-style mineralisation within this newly defined corridor. The discrete gravity anomalies, are modelled with amplitudes ranging from 0.8 to 1.8 milligals, interpreted depths between 60m and 200m, and strike lengths between ~ 300m and 1km. The gravity bodies coincide with subdued magnetic responses, suggesting they are unlikely to be associated with magnetic dolerite sills that are common throughout the stratigraphic profile at Jaguar. However, it does not discount the possibility that the gravity bodies could be associated with nonmagnetic mafic bodies. Although surface geochemical coverage remains limited, a rock chip sampling program is underway across the eight priority targets. Preliminary results, which are still being evaluated, have returned low-level anomalies in multiple pathfinder elements, such as Ag, As, Bi, In, Pb, Sb, Sn, and Tl, further supporting the potential for VHMS-style mineralisation. Stockman Project (VIC) Key points for quarter:  Detailed Albion leach metallurgical test work completed with remaining test work due in Q1 FY26  Preliminary design of Albion and alternate pyrite-based flowsheet to incorporate sulphuric acid generation due for completion in Q1 FY26  Site visits to locations for proposed downstream processing facility completed, with associated permitting requirements being assessed 15 Corporate Cash and Receivables At the end of the quarter, Aeris increased useable cash and receivables to $49.5 million with a closing unrestricted cash balance of $28.2 million. Approximately ~$10 million was released to cash during the quarter under the refinanced facilities (see below for more information). Total restricted cash held against bonds reduced to $17 million. (A$ Million) Sep 24 Dec 24 Mar 25 Jun 25 QTR QTR QTR QTR Closing Cash Receivables Mt Colin 25.5 26.4 22.4 28.2 3.6 0.3 - - Cracow - 0.1 - - Tritton 10.0 6.2 11.2 21.3 39.1 33.0 33.6 49.5 Useable Cash and Receivables Cash flow from operations at $34 million was lower than previous quarter due to timing of receipts. Receivable were considerably higher at $21.3 million; a significant portion was received in July 2025. Sep 24 Dec 24 Mar 25 Jun 25 QTR QTR QTR QTR Opening cash Cash flow from operations Cash flow from capital expenditure 24.8 25.4 (19.4) 25.5 33.2 (25.9) 26.4 45.4 (31.5) 22.4 34.0 (24.9) Cash flow from financing (5.2) (6.4) (17.8) (3.2) Closing cash 25.5 26.4 22.4 28.2 (A$ Million) Figure 8: June Quarter Cash Flow (A$M) 16 Figure 9: YTD Cash Flow (A$M) Debt and Hedging During the quarter the company completed the refinancing of its $50 million guarantee facility with ANZ with a new $60 million guarantee facility from Washington H. Soul Pattinson (WHSP). The facility agreement also extended the term on the $50 million loan facility (drawn to $40 million) with WHSP to 31 August 2026. The Company had no hedges in place at the end of the quarter. Authorised for lodgement by: Andre Labuschagne Executive Chairman ENDS For further information, please contact: Andre Labuschagne Executive Chairman Tel: +61 7 3034 6200 Stefan Edelman General Manager – Corporate Development investorrelations@aerisresources.com.au or visit our website at www.aerisresources.com.au About Aeris Aeris Resources is a mid-tier base and precious metals producer. Its copper dominant portfolio comprises two operating assets, a mine on care and maintenance, a longlife development project and a highly prospective exploration portfolio. Aeris has a strong pipeline of organic growth projects, an aggressive exploration program and continues to investigate strategic merger and acquisition opportunities. The Company’s experienced board and management team bring significant corporate and technical expertise to a lean operating model. Aeris is committed to building strong partnerships with its key community, investment and workforce stakeholders. 17 Competent Persons Statement Mr Chris Raymond confirms that he is the Competent Person for all Exploration Results at the Tritton Operation, and he has read and understood the requirements of the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code, 2012 Edition). Mr Raymond is a Competent Person as defined by the JORC Code, 2012 Edition, having relevant experience to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit described in the Report and to the activity for which he is accepting responsibility. Mr Raymond is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG No. 6045). Mr Raymond has reviewed the Report to which this Consent Statement applies and consents to the inclusion in the Report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. Mr Raymond is a full-time employee of Aeris Resources Limited. The information in this report that relates to Exploration Targets or Exploration Results at the Cracow Operation is based on information compiled by Craig Judson. Mr Judson confirms that he is the Competent Person for all Exploration Results, summarised in this Report and he has read and understood the requirements of the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Targets, Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code, 2012 Edition). Mr Judson is a Competent Person as defined by the JORC Code, 2012 Edition, having relevant experience to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit described in the Report and to the activity for which he is accepting responsibility. Mr Judson is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM No. 325510). Mr Judson has reviewed the Report to which this Consent Statement applies and consents to the inclusion in the Report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. Mr Judson is a full-time employee of Aeris Resources Limited. The information in this report that relates to Exploration Targets or Exploration Results at the Jaguar Operation is based on information compiled by Alain Cotnoir. Mr Cotnoir confirms that he is the Competent Person for all Exploration Results, summarised in this Report and he has read and understood the requirements of the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Targets, Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code, 2012 Edition). Mr Cotnoir is a Competent Person as defined by the JORC Code, 2012 Edition, having relevant experience to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit described in the Report and to the activity for which he is accepting responsibility. Mr Cotnoir is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM No. 315017). Mr Cotnoir has reviewed the Report to which this Consent Statement applies and consents to the inclusion in the Report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. Mr Cotnoir is a full-time employee of Aeris Resources Limited. 18 APPENDIX A: Summary of Golden Plateau drill hole collar, survey details and significant intersections for holes not previously reported. Hole ID Local X (m) Local Y (m) RL (m) Total Depth (m) Local Azi Dip Company Depth From (m) Depth To (m) Downhole Length (m) Au Grade (g/t) AT32 1344.41 2081.61 2424 20 56.99 -60 Sedimentary 1 18 17 1.44 ATF4 2365 2082 2396 22 70 -70 Sedimentary 2 19 17 2.45 ATF5 2355 2078 2396 30 70 -70 Sedimentary 1 7 6 0.63 Sedimentary 11 21 10 1.62 2360 2080 2396 44 70 -70 Sedimentary 25 27 2 0.76 Sedimentary 32 33 1 1.98 ATF5 ATF6 ATF6 ATF8 2365.3 2062.8 2393 18 70 -70 Sedimentary 0 6 6 0.49 ATF9 2356.1 2059.3 2391 39 70 -70 Sedimentary 0 6 6 0.76 Sedimentary 14 39 25 2.01 1939.1 2092.8 2460.8 175 180 -60 Sedimentary 6 19 13 3.89 CDH1 Sedimentary 23 30 7 0.91 CDH1 Sedimentary 41 68 27 0.64 CDH1 Sedimentary 101 106.25 5.25 1.97 CDH1 Sedimentary 116.15 118.83 2.68 0.57 CDH1 Sedimentary 123.17 133.3 10.13 1.45 CDH1 Sedimentary 136.95 164 27.05 0.99 ATF9 CDH1 CDH2 Sedimentary 116.95 118.2 1.25 1.49 CDH2 Sedimentary 134.2 144.7 10.5 1.28 CDH2 Sedimentary 188.45 190 1.55 0.81 Sedimentary 118.65 119.65 1 0.93 CDH3 Sedimentary 151.7 153.7 2 1.43 CDH3 Sedimentary 169.6 171 1.4 3.76 Sedimentary 137.15 139.76 2.61 0.69 CDH4 Sedimentary 148.97 150.97 2 2.35 CDH4 Sedimentary 154.63 159.23 4.6 0.89 CDH4 Sedimentary 167.87 169.2 1.33 0.8 CDH4 Sedimentary 181.7 196.45 14.75 0.95 Sedimentary 83 127 44 2.4 CDH3 CDH4 2287.81 2282.92 2291.03 1918.48 1904.21 1907.28 2463.16 2463.38 2463.36 190 171 200.3 0 0 340 -59 -59.5 -60 CDH7 1877.74 1966.5 2467.26 139 0 -60 CGP001 2322.11 1744.04 2470 597.1 353 -65 Newcrest 282.5 286.4 3.9 1.32 CGP002 1403.71 1461.85 2370 480.6 92 -53.2 Newcrest 101 103 2 1.13 CGP003 1917.23 1644.96 2411 546.9 299.3 -58.9 Newcrest CGP004 1927.81 1665.41 2415 576.6 41.5 -50.1 Newcrest 248 250 2 13.87 Newcrest 255 256 1 0.81 CGP004 CGP004 No Sig Int Newcrest 501 502 1 1 Newcrest 113 114 1 0.67 CGP005 Newcrest 197 199 2 2.01 CGP005 Newcrest 279 280 1 6.8 Newcrest 354 355 1 1.32 CGP005 1832.92 1601.33 2414 590.1 288 -57 CGP005 CGP006 1872.82 1318.06 2384 538.2 263 -55 Newcrest No Sig Int CGP007 1926.19 1662.19 2411 438.8 42 -59 Newcrest No Sig Int 19 Hole ID Local X (m) Local Y (m) RL (m) Total Depth (m) Local Azi Dip Company Depth From (m) Depth To (m) Downhole Length (m) Au Grade (g/t) CGP008 2492.71 1790.17 2451 558 116 -53 Newcrest 184 185 1 0.97 Newcrest 248 249 1 1.52 CGP008 CGP008A 2491.59 1791.04 2451 89 CGP009 2817.45 1435.13 2363 405 CGP010 2528.44 2171.89 2397 321.3 CGP011R 1734.97 1863.91 2463 94 CGP012R 1729.64 1866.28 2463 86 CGP013R 1725.18 1869.76 2463 CGP014R 1749.58 1879.84 2466.19 CGP021 1774.19 1882.35 2468 183.6 116 -53 Newcrest 274 -50 Newcrest 352.99 -60.5 Newcrest 301 -69 Newcrest No Sig Int 301 -64 Newcrest No Sig Int 86 301 -58 Newcrest No Sig Int 104 323 -75 Newcrest No Sig Int 153 -76 Newcrest 150.6 162 11.4 8.4 Newcrest 174.6 175.6 1 1.22 CGP021 No Sig Int No Sig Int 202.5 206 3.5 0.52 CGP024 2044.22 2365.05 2444.14 300 173 -50 Newcrest No Sig Int CGP025 1627.16 2233.64 2468.13 304 220 -50 Newcrest No Sig Int CGP026 1635.48 2110.66 2460.53 244 218 -50 Newcrest No Sig Int CGP027 2047.73 1452.13 2391.77 388 353 -50 Newcrest CGP028 2130.94 1730.84 2478.6 298 38 -52 Newcrest CGP029 2029.54 1781.68 2471.81 227 325 -56 Newcrest CGP030 2466.89 2136.21 2406.88 300 264 -53 Newcrest 109 110 1 1.01 CGP030 Newcrest 127 129 2 0.78 CGP030 Newcrest 216 219 3 0.65 297 298 1 5.31 No Sig Int No Sig Int CGP032 2029.56 1778.59 2471.57 300 38 -76 Newcrest No Sig Int CGP033 1784.05 1877.42 2468.18 140 2 -90 Newcrest No Sig Int CGP034 1735.58 1871.12 2464.03 129 2 -90 Newcrest No Sig Int CGP035 1739.84 1864.1 2464.16 154 158.5 -78 Newcrest No Sig Int CGP036 2758.35 1940.47 2398 300 147 -70 Newcrest 88 89 1 0.